olivia-hartono
Global energy markets have experienced another sharp jolt as benchmark crude futures surged well past the $100-a-barrel threshold, exposing a stark divide between official United States assertions of stabilizing maritime security and the worsening operational realities facing commercial shipping across the Middle East.
In recent trading, international benchmark Brent crude increased by $3.21 to reach $107.82 per barrel, while the United States benchmark, West Texas Intermediate, advanced by $3.17 to settle at $103.22 per barrel. The single-day gains of more than 3 percent reflect mounting unease among traders who fear that crucial export channels remain highly vulnerable to regional conflict and military strikes.
The sharp upward momentum in prices comes despite persistent public assurances from Washington that military efforts are effectively reopening the Strait of Hormuz. The strategic chokepoint, which normally handles approximately one-fifth of the world’s petroleum and liquefied natural gas shipments, has become the primary theater of maritime contestation.
United States President Donald Trump has asserted that American forces maintain total control over the passage and are actively escorting commercial vessels carrying millions of barrels of crude through the corridor. The White House has sought to project confidence that the disruption to commercial maritime navigation is being systematically reversed through convoy operations.
Reinforcing that narrative, US Energy Secretary Chris Wright reported that roughly 10 million barrels per day moved through the waterway on average over the past week. Wright characterized this volume as representing around two-thirds or slightly more of normal historic transit levels, arguing that while global energy supplies are tighter than desirable, the market has not reached an overly constrained crisis state.
However, authorities in Tehran have completely rejected the American assessment, asserting that Iran retains operational authority over access to the waterway. Iranian officials have warned international shippers against navigating any maritime routes that have not received explicit clearance, while recently implementing a newly declared restricted transit zone across the strategic passage.
Independent tracking assessments also contradict the optimistic outlook presented by Western officials. Preliminary vessel-monitoring figures compiled by ship-tracking services indicate that traffic through the Strait of Hormuz dropped to single-digit vessel counts over the weekend, falling noticeably below the recent 10-day average of 14 transits per day.
According to Reuters, monitoring data recorded a total of just 14 vessel transits over the evaluated period, consisting of 10 ships entering the Gulf and only four departing. Industry analysts note that these figures remain preliminary, particularly as numerous commercial tankers navigate the region with their Automatic Identification System transponders switched off to obscure their movements, excluding them from standard tracking counts.
The current shipping volume represents a dramatic collapse compared to conditions prior to February, when the outbreak of war involving the United States, Israel, and Iran upended regional stability. Before the escalation of direct hostilities, more than 100 vessels traversed the strait every day, collectively moving an estimated 20 million barrels of crude oil to international destinations.
Market anxiety has been compounded by a succession of direct attacks on vessels and transit infrastructure. Over the weekend, an Iranian ship was struck in the Strait of Hormuz, while the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations reported that another commercial vessel was hit by an unidentified projectile while attempting passage through the waterway. Adding to the friction, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps confirmed it intercepted and destroyed an advanced American MQ-1 drone operating overhead.
Compounding the maritime crisis, Saudi Arabia suffered a major disruption to its primary overland energy bypass when a drone attack launched from Iraqi territory temporarily forced the closure of its critical East-West oil pipeline. Riyadh has relied heavily on this infrastructure to move crude directly to Red Sea export terminals, circumventing the maritime risks in the Gulf. The prolonged suspension of the pipeline threatens approximately 4 percent of the global oil supply.
Regional supply security has been further undermined by a broader wave of aerial strikes launched by Yemen’s Houthi movement against southern Saudi Arabian territory. Recent missile and drone barrages struck economic and civilian targets across the cities of Abha, Khamis Mushait, Jizan, and Najran, leaving 73 individuals injured, including women and children.
The strikes on Saudi population centers underscore the severe resurgence of the conflict in Yemen, which reignited in July after roughly four years of fragile stability established under a United Nations-mediated truce. The renewed hostilities have added fresh geopolitical risk premiums to energy exports originating from the kingdom, the world's leading crude exporter.
Financial analysts emphasize that the accumulation of logistical bottlenecks and ongoing military exchanges makes elevated oil prices inevitable. Chris Beauchamp, chief market analyst at IG Group, observed that despite official claims from Washington, the Strait of Hormuz is not under secure control, preventing petroleum supplies from flowing unhindered to international buyers.
Beauchamp highlighted that near-month futures contracts continue to trade at a noticeable premium compared to spot prices, signaling that market participants expect severe shipping disruptions to endure and compound broader inflationary pressures on the global economy. With diplomatic initiatives, including talks in Oman involving Gulf states and Iran, facing delays and lack of momentum, market experts warn that crude benchmarks may soon retest the elevated price peaks recorded earlier in March.
Comments (0)