South Korea has formally demanded an official apology and explanation from Ukraine following Kyiv's public disclosure of the transfer of two North Korean prisoners of war to Seoul, a move that has triggered a diplomatic rift between the two governments and raised questions about trust and confidentiality in sensitive negotiations.
The dispute centers on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's announcement at the United Nations General Assembly last week that his country had handed over two captured North Korean soldiers to South Korea. According to Seoul, that announcement violated an explicit non-disclosure agreement that Ukraine had requested and repeatedly discussed through various diplomatic channels.
Seong Ghi-hong, senior presidential secretary for public relations, stated on Sunday that the presidential office expressed "strong regret over Ukraine's unilateral disclosure and its subsequent false announcement that there had not been a non-disclosure agreement." He added that Ukraine had sought secrecy during multiple discussions about the prisoners' transfer, making the public revelation particularly damaging.
Ukrainian officials have countered that no such confidentiality agreement ever existed, a denial that South Korean officials say has seriously undermined trust between the two governments and could have lasting consequences for bilateral relations.
The two North Korean soldiers were captured in January 2025 in Russia's Kursk region, where Ukraine launched a significant incursion in August 2024 before subsequently losing most of the territory it had seized. They became the first North Korean soldiers to be taken alive since Pyongyang began providing military support to Moscow's war effort in 2024.
In his UN address, Zelenskyy described the harrowing circumstances of their capture, noting that one soldier attempted to take his own life upon realizing he would become a prisoner and was shocked that fate prevented his death. The Ukrainian president also condemned North Korea's decision to send troops to support Russia, questioning why Koreans should sacrifice their lives in a war against Ukraine and accusing North Korean leader Kim Jong Un of using his soldiers "like currency" to obtain something in return.
Zelenskyy initially indicated he would be willing to hand the captured soldiers over to Kim if the North Korean leader could facilitate an exchange for Ukrainians held captive in Russia. However, human rights organizations urged him to send the prisoners to South Korea instead, citing the serious risks of punishment they would face if returned to North Korea. South Korean media also reported that the two soldiers had expressed a desire to defect to Seoul.
South Korea had previously declined to confirm the soldiers' arrival, citing concerns about their safety and that of their family members still living in North Korea. The government's cautious approach reflected the highly sensitive nature of any matter involving North Korean defectors, given the potential for retaliation against relatives remaining in the isolated country.
President Lee Jae Myung expressed his frustration in a post on X, describing the repatriation of North Korean prisoners of war as a "highly sensitive agenda." He criticized what he characterized as Ukraine's desire to publicize the transfer for international recognition, writing that those who "advertised the repatriation to the whole world with enthusiastic fanfare to show off their achievements" likely could not understand South Korea's efforts to maintain confidentiality and might even question the government's approach.
"I do not know the reasons behind Ukraine's disclosure in violation of the non-disclosure agreement, but it is deeply regrettable," Lee added, underscoring the sense of betrayal felt in Seoul.
The diplomatic dispute has also ignited domestic political controversy in South Korea. Opposition politicians have condemned Lee's government for failing to inform the public about the transfer. Ahn Cheol-soo of the People Power Party questioned on social media whether it was "fair" that the Korean public learned about North Korean POWs being in the country through Zelenskyy's UN speech rather than through their own government.
Ahn further challenged the president directly, asking why the transfer was hidden and speculating whether North Korea possessed compromising information or whether the government had planned to return the prisoners to the North. These accusations have intensified political pressure on Lee's administration at a time when inter-Korean relations remain deeply strained.
The Korean Peninsula remains technically in a state of war, as the 1950-1953 Korean War concluded with an armistice rather than a peace treaty. Thousands of United States soldiers continue to be stationed in South Korea, and the two allies conduct regular military exercises that North Korea has consistently denounced as preparation for invasion.
According to Ukrainian and South Korean estimates, approximately 14,000 to 15,000 North Korean soldiers were deployed to support Russia's war efforts, with most sent to the Kursk region. As a close ally of Moscow, Pyongyang has also supplied substantial military equipment, including artillery and mortar rounds, ballistic missiles, long-range artillery systems and multiple-launch rocket systems, according to Ukrainian and independent assessments. The two Koreas remain divided by the world's most heavily fortified border, with any interaction involving North Korean citizens carrying profound political and security implications.
The captured soldiers are expected to undergo questioning by South Korean authorities, though further details about their status and the potential for defection have not been disclosed. The outcome of the diplomatic dispute between Seoul and Kyiv remains uncertain, with both sides maintaining their positions on whether a confidentiality agreement existed. For South Korea, the incident raises broader questions about how to balance transparency with the extremely delicate considerations involved in handling North Korean defectors whose families remain vulnerable to Pyongyang's retribution.
Comments (0)